Tuesday, February 22, 2011

From Friends of Kent County Schools (Grassroots)

There currently exists an estimated $600 million "surplus" in the School Aid Fund (SAF). The Governor's proposed budget allocates $196 million to community colleges and $700 million to universities-both out of the SAF, but because the SAF is $300 million short of that combined number, the Governor is reducing K-12 funding for 2011-12 by $300 million!


Keep in mind that community colleges and universities have the means to increase operational revenue through tuition and fees. Public schools do not.

See the Friends of Kent County Schools link on this page.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Deep Cuts=End of Any Local Control?

Facing deep cuts, will schools innovate or fight for status quo?

Published: Friday, February 18, 2011, 7:37 AM Updated: Friday, February 18, 2011, 7:30 PM
By Dave Murray
The Grand Rapids Press
www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2011/02/facing_deep_cuts_will_schools.html

In this article published last Friday, writer Dave Murray states that schools "should have known" that the structural deficit was looming.  He substantiates this opinion by pointing out that the Grand Rapids Press funded a study last summer by Michigan State University to investigate the number of school districts (more than 500) in the State of Michigan and that we would save a lot of money if we consolidated school districts.  While this may be true, please remember that each and every school district is represented by an elected school board whose members are chosen by the community to steer the school district financially, academically and within the social norms of that community.  These boards have had much control taken away from them since Proposal A has taken much of the funding out of local hands.  Even so, I don't think many of the school boards are going to spontaneously go out of business.  I am not sure what the legal implications would be if they tried to do that. 

While I want to thank The Grand Rapids Press for this information, I feel that if the State of Michigan wants to make drastic changes to the last bit of local control provided by communities over local education issues, then this needs to come from the Governor or the Legislature.  So far, it seems that the only thing coming out of Lansing is a starvation budget which is going to decimate schools as they are organized today.  I guess this is a matter of "tearing it down" before "building it back up."  I am worried about my children's education while this experimental reinvention is going on.  What is this going to look like?  How are children going to be affected?

Lucy Lafleur

Thursday, February 17, 2011

What Can We Do?

Let's contact our legislators today.  The emails are next to this post.  Your State House Representative is Lisa Lyons.  Your State Senator is Mark Jansen.  Thank you!!

Dear Ms. Lyons,

I found out today that the School Aid Fund is now responsible for community colleges and universities as well as public K-12 education.  While I am an advocate for education, I believe that this transfer of responsibility ignores the intention of the voters who passed Proposal A in 1994 to secure funding for K-12 education.  I found out that with this transfer, public K-12 education will receive a $300 million cut which translates into a $300 per student cut.  Taken with the cuts from this year, this totals a $470 per student cut. This is unacceptable.  The Governor asked for shared sacrifice.  With the number of cuts this year and last, public education has taken more than its share of cuts and sacrifice.  Please use your position as a member of the State House representing me and save the integrity of K-12 public education.

Sincerely,

Dear Senator Jansen,

I found out today that the School Aid Fund is now responsible for community colleges and universities as well as public K-12 education. While I am an advocate for education, I believe that this transfer of responsibility ignores the intention of the voters who passed Proposal A in 1994 to secure funding for K-12 education. I found out that with this transfer, public K-12 education will receive a $300 million cut which translates into a $300 per student cut. Taken with the cuts from this school year, it is a $470 per student cut.  This is unacceptable. The Governor asked for shared sacrifice. With the number of cuts this year and last, public education has taken more than its share of cuts. Please use your position as a member of the State House representing me and save the integrity of K-12 public education.


Sincerely,

Also let Governor Snyder know that you do not support his new budget proposal. 

Dear Governor Snyder--

I found out today that the School Aid Fund is now responsible for community colleges and universities as well as public K-12 education. While I am an advocate for education, I believe that this transfer of responsibility ignores the intention of the voters who passed Proposal A in 1994 to secure funding for K-12 education. I found out that with this transfer, public K-12 education will receive a $300 million cut which translates into a $300 per student cut. Taken with the cuts from this school year, it is a $470 per student cut. This is unacceptable. The Governor asked for shared sacrifice. With the number of cuts this year and last, public education has taken more than its share of cuts. Please use your position as a member of the State House representing me and save the integrity of K-12 public education.


Sincerely,

Governor Snyder Talks of Shared Pain

Governor Snyder speaks of a shared pain in balancing the budget, but it seems that the burden of cuts is affecting children, especially public school children.  If you are interested in what children from less advantaged households will be suffering, please check the Michigan League for Human Services website for information on how poor children will be affected by these cuts.  We need to be made aware that while our children in East Grand Rapids will be suffering from these cuts, children in surrounding communities whose families were getting by will be pushed into poverty and all of the problems that go along with that.  www.milhs.org/winners-losers-in-budget 

Lucy

Why is the Retirement Percentage so Important?

I have been sitting in Legislative Committee meetings for four years now and the retirement percentage comes up regularly.  I believe I understand it now enough to explain it to others.  Under the 1963 constitution when the school aid fund was established and again under Proposal A of 1994, it stated that school districts would be responsible to pay for their employees retirement.  This sounds reasonable.  The individual school districts are not responsible for their own retirees, however, they receive a percentage from the state that tells them what percentage of every dollar in salary and benefits paid to today's staff have to go to the state pool of retirees.  In the early 2000's the percentage was close to 10-12%.  This year, it was estimated to be 19.5% but then in October was recalculated to 21.06%.  This is a huge amount of money that is calculated to go up for next year to 24-27% of every salary/benefit dollar spent.  This is another cut in funding for today's teachers to teach today's students.

Lucy

How Can the Governor Justify Funding Colleges with School Aid Fund?

This is a reasonable question.  I have been investigating these funding issues for a long time as a concerned parent.  I remember voting for Proposal A in the mid 1990's.  I thought that K-12 education was secured with this vote.  Apparently, there is a caveat to the Proposal A that is now being capitalized upon.  Under the State's 1963 (most recent) constitution, a school aid (small letters) fund was established to provide funding for and to take care of the retirement for public schools, community colleges and universities.  Although Proposal A addressed the funding of K-12 schools alone, because the consitution includes community colleges and universities, it allows this massive and drastic change in funding.  I believe strongly and I hope you consider that this interpretation of the constitution and Proposal A does not address the intention of the voters who were supposing that their vote would support K-12 schools.

Governor's Proposal of a $300 per pupil cut

What we learned tonight at the Friends of Kent County Schools (Grassroots) meeting is that the School Aid Fund is now responsible for community colleges at a rate of $196 million and universities at a rate of $700 million.  While some money will travel with them, the amount in the School Aid Fund that actually funds K-12 education will decrease by $300 million or a $300 cut per child in Michigan.  There is no reinstatement of the $170 cut that was made last year.  This cut is devastating.  the foundation grant that each district receives to educate our children is going to be equivalent to what was spent in the 2005-06 school year although costs have gone up in all categories. 

Please be aware that universities received a 15% cut in this proposal.  Community colleges are held even.
Lucy Lafleur

Legislative Committee Update

1. At the end of last school year, $200 million in the School Aid Fund which had not been anticipated was moved out of the School Aid Fund to pay for Community Colleges. This was an unprecedented move which was perpetrated by “loaning” the money to community colleges from the School Aid Fund. Now it looks as though the School Aid Fund will be held responsible for Community Colleges. This will result in all of the recent cuts to schools plus a new $300 per child cut for next school year. Community college budget will remain intact.




2. We need parents, grandparents and all community members to let legislators know that we are not going to sit quietly and accept these cuts. Your Legislative Committee is working with the State of Michigan PTA, the Kent County Grassroots advocacy organization and others to organize a response to this. Please keep posted on the facebook page and the blog to see what advocacy we will need from all parents.

GRASSROOTS MESSAGE ABOUT BUDGET CUTS

Governor Rick Snyder's BUDGET BOMBSHELL Public Schools will lose 4% or $470/Student


As you may have heard, the Governor released details of his proposed budget which includes a 4% reduction in K-12 funding for public schools. This would mean an additional $300 cut per student in addition to last year's $170 cut. As an example, in Rockford, this would mean an additional $2.4 million to eliminate from the budget. This reduction would put Rockford at less than their 2005-06 funding level!

On the flip side, the Governor's budget holds community colleges harmless - remember, attending community college is a choice - K-12 education is mandated by law. Community colleges have the ability to increase revenue through tuition. Public K-12 schools rely solely on State funding and have no options to increase revenue. Where is the reasoning?

Please join the Friends of Kent County Schools grassroots group tonight as we hear from a representative from the Michigan Association of Schools Boards on what this means and how we can advocate for Michigan's students. We need your voice! The meeting will be held at the KISD Educational Services Center from 7:00-8:30 p.m. (See here for meeting details).





Contact Us

email: friendsofkentcounty@gmail.com

phone: 616.240.2256

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Three main points from 2-7-11 Legislative Committee Meeting

1. Although the School Aid Fund seems to be well funded for the rest of this school year and next, we are concerned about the “surpluses” being used to offset other areas of the budget and with the structural deficit which will occur when federal dollars run out.
2. Governor Snyder’s advocacy for education may mean an over hall of The School Aid Fund to be responsible for early childhood through university education.

3. Budget variables, including the retirement contribution rate and the MESA health insurance for teachers and union staff may be so high as to push the budget into as much as a $1.5 million deficit with only cost of living increases in expenses in all other areas of the budget.

We Will Need Your Help!!

As news comes in from the restructuring of the Michigan's government, we will be learning how these changes affect K-12 public education.  We will need your support and energy to let our elected officials know what we think of the changes.  Get ready to contact your legislators and the governor as news comes out next week.

Grassroots Meeting Th, 2-17 at 7pm KISD building Knapp and E. Beltline

Grassroots is a Kent County Education advocacy group which has been meeting for several years.  They are really trying to get more parents involved.  This would be a great time to check it out with all of the changes coming in Governor Snyder's proposals.  The next meeting is Thursday, 2-17-10 at 7pm at the KISD building at Knapp and the East Beltline. 

Legislative Committee Concerns

This talk was given at the PTA Council meeting 2-7-2011 by Lucy Lafleur.


Public Education Funding

Public Education. It’s why we’re here today. We support public education as the foundation all children in Michigan need to succeed. It is the great equalizer that sustains our middle class standard of living in this great state and country.

Your Legislative Committee has a list of concerns about the funding of public education, but before we can share those concerns, we need to review some basic terms that define the funding of public education currently so that we are all on equal footing as changes occur.

First, I want to give a little history of where we have come from. Before the mid-1990’s, Michigan funded schools using local property taxes. Everything was decided on the local level then. Michigan was prosperous at the time. Even with periodic recessions, Michigan’s economy was healthy overall. As the years went by, however, property taxes became burdensome. There was also a significant disparity between wealthy districts and poor districts on the amount that was spent to educate children. All of this had become uncomfortable but nothing changed until a crisis occurred. Kalkaska schools closed their doors early due to a lack of funds. This was the wake up call that was needed to implement change.

Change came in the form of Proposal A which was passed by voters in 1994 and implemented the next school year. K-12 school funding was taken out of the hands of local authorities and given to the state. This is why the state budget crises affect schools so much. Each district, with a few exceptions, now receives roughly the same amount of money per student to educate them. The money received from the State of Michigan is called The Foundation Grant. This money came from an expansion of the sales tax by 2% as well as a list of other small taxes, including the lottery, real estate transfer taxes and some sin taxes. This pot of taxes or revenue is called The School Aid Fund which is supposed to be dedicated to K-12 school funding.

Once the Foundation Grant is received by the school district, restrictions are made on the district as to how the dollars can be spent, under Proposal A. These funds can only be used for teacher salaries, benefits and classroom materials. No other monies can be used for these expenses which are called Operational Expenses. EGRPS’s Operational Expenses are 85% of our budget. Local school boards can ask the voters for bonds, such as the Athletic Bond to pay for new buildings or athletic facilities and for sinking fund money to cover maintenance expenses. We also receive some money from the federal government for special populations, such as special education. These monies are called Title funds.

One thing to keep in mind as we discuss the School Aid Fund and the Foundation Grant is that the federal stimulus and Edujobs money have been propping them up. We are receiving federal dollars this school year and will be using the last of the federal dollars next school year and then they will be done. Those missing federal dollars the following year will be a structural deficit which has to be dealt with.

So, with those basics, here are our current concerns.



1. Although the budget projections show that the School Aid Fund is well funded for this school year and next, we are concerned about that structural deficit for the following year.

2. At the end of last school year, $200 million in the School Aid Fund which had not been anticipated was moved out of the School Aid Fund to pay for Community Colleges. While this is a noble cause, under Proposal A, no funds are to be moved out of the School Aid Fund. Now that this precedent is set, the School Aid Fund will look pretty attractive to politicians who are trying to balance a $1.8 trillion deficit in the rest of the budget.

3. Governor Snyder reported in his State of the State address that he plans to close the structural deficits all over the state budget. While we applaud this, we would like to know how K-12 will be affected.

4. Governor Snyder mentioned in his State of the State address that he values education from early childhood through adulthood. This is great from an education advocate’s point of view, but what does this mean for the School Aid Fund? How are K-12 schools going to compete with community colleges or universities for funding?

If any of this interests you, please follow the blog from your PTA pages. I also encourage you to check out Grassroots which is a parent and educator education advocacy group which meets monthly during the school year. The next meeting is Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 7pm at the KISD building at Knapp and the East Beltline. The Legislative Committee will keep you posted.